[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYER6akShYLzjj9h6MmFYnPD--gsAy+8rwZx8P6Hv7ZdybA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 21:28:50 +0200
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com>
Subject: Re: musl perf, 20% slower than native build?
2015-04-08 21:10 GMT+02:00 John Mudd <johnbmudd@...il.com>:
> Here's output from perf record/report for libc. This looks consistent with
> the 5% longer run time.
>
> native:
> 2.20% python libc-2.19.so [.] __memcpy_ssse3
>
> musl:
> 4.74% python libc.so [.] memcpy
I was able to get twice speed-up (in my code) just by replacing memcpy
in the musl.
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
