[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150326045301.GE23507@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:53:01 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: nsz libc-test
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 08:58:12PM -0400, stephen Turner wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 25, 2015 7:07 PM, "stephen Turner" <stephen.n.turner@...il.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> ok i found a tarball i could grab without needing git. I unpacked and ran
> >> the build but it looks like everything fails. I found a REPORT file in the
> >> src directory i have attached as well as the output from make. Have i run
> >> your test correctly?
> >>
> >
> I ran these tests on glibc and produced a lot of errors as well so im
> assuming im running it correctly and this is standard output.
>
> Rich, this output is from my pcc + musl system that has been producing
> corrupted libc.so files. if anything stands out to anyone i would be happy
> to hear it so i can look into it further.
>
> there is the make.log2 which is the make output from "CC="pcc -g" make" and
> of course the REPORT from the src folder.
>
> thanks for all the support and i appreciate any input you have about this
> test.
You're not going to get any meaningful results without removing
-pedantic-errors from the config.mak. pcc is erroring out due to the
unrecognized option without building any tests.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
