[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcOSxzkoC=ZuC_jE3O+rSVMHGpPWumssvsbbKYSOM9PgYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:05:31 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: musl <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64/memset: use "small block" code for blocks
up to 30 bytes long
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> For
> me, I get ~1 cycle difference for a number of the small runs, but on
> your test that measures rates in a way that's probably more applicable
> to real-world use, there was no measureable difference one way or the
> other.
We had an enjoyable bike shed painting session, don't we?
"Optimizing memset", a must for anyone who knows assembly :D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
