musl - Re: [PATCH] Add stdatomic.h for clang>=3.1 and gcc>=4.1

Message-ID: <CAA7aPHjZvk0J4pDAs3CLbq9+9tciJ1s07bOiAouw_nqa952Uyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:29:17 -0500
From: stephen Turner <stephen.n.turner@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add stdatomic.h for clang>=3.1 and gcc>=4.1

It sounds like the ideal path would be to rebuild a compiler to posix
standards? If I understand your conversation at all your saying that
niether the clang or gcc compilers are ideal for the standard. Perhaps tcc
or gcc etc, has a version which could lend itself both in licensing and
core functionality to be a good starting point for the standard?

Content of type "text/html" skipped

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.