[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545B6B36.6060806@barfooze.de>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:36:06 +0100
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: fixing -fPIE + -fstack-protector-all
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 11/05/14 10:43, Rich Felker wrote:
>> However, this proposed solution breaks one odd corner case: static
>> linking when all the source files were compiled with -fPIC or -fPIE.
>> In that case, there would be no references to __stack_chk_fail, only
>> to __stack_chk_fail_local, and thereby __init_ssp would not get
>> linked, and a zero canary would be used.
>
> I would rather not see this solution.
>
why ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
