[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141031032410.GZ22465@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:24:10 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: the prototype decl of memcpy/memcmp/calloc/free should
not in sched.h
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:03:35AM +0800, 黄建忠 wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> sched.h in musl should not contains the prototype declarations of "memcpy/memcmp/calloc/free" func.
>
> memcpy/memcmp already in string.h
> calloc/free already in stdlib.h
>
> Any reason they should exist in sched.h?
They're present only under _GNU_SOURCE mode, and the reason is that
musl's CPU_* macros for working with cpu sets for affinity use these
functions directly rather than having additional exported symbols in a
protected namespace to do the work. Is this approach causing a problem
for you?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
