|
Message-ID: <20141001145424.GM23797@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:54:24 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: printf() less __assert_fail() On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:45:44PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > It makes no sense to use printf() in this function. Is this a good idea? I'm not sure why it "makes no sense". There are a few minor differences in behavior with your version, the main ones I see being that yours is non-atomic but async-signal-safe. Are there major reasons you want to change it? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.