[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK4o1Wzz9CZgza8opJ_Po0BMufEmbPpC0EDxJum9jJBJ4TkhDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:03:06 +0100
From: Justin Cormack <justin@...cialbusservice.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: faccessat and AT_SYM_NOFOLLOW
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM, <u-wsnj@...ey.se> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:01:10PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
>> to get the file ownership and mode and performs its own access
>> permissions check in userspace. This is imprecise and does not
>> respect ACLs or any other advanced permission models provided by
>
> Of course, that's plainly wrong.
>
>> So my conclusion? There are some moderate-level documentation errors.
>> glibc implements the flag, but not correctly. The changes I would
>> recommend to the documentation:
>>
>> 1. Document that AT_SYM_NOFOLLOW is not standard for this function,
>> and is a glibc extension. (uclibc is just a copy of glibc code)
>>
>> 2. Document that AT_SYM_NOFOLLOW and AT_EACCESS are emulated and
>> unreliable on glibc.
>>
>> 3. Document that the man page is covering the POSIX/glibc function
>> details, and the kernel syscall does not support flags at all.
>> (This might aid in getting the kernel folks to add a new faccessat4
>> syscall that would do flags at the kernel level.)
>>
>> Do these sound reasonable?
>
> Yes (but I would look for a stronger wording than "unreliable" :)
>
>> Issue 2: Should musl support or ignore the AT_SYM_NOFOLLOW with
>> faccessat?
>
> [your analysis looks for my eyes correct]
>
> I would not bother implementing something which does not make sense
> (worse, would mislead the programmers, iow inflicting damage instead
> of doing any good).
Seems reasonable.
I note that Musl calls faccessat with the flag though, even though the
syscall appears to not be defined with the flag, so that should
probably be fixed, if I havent misread anything.
I don't think anyone will add faccessat4, given that the whole idea is
basically broken.
Justin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
