Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140831003517.GO12888@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 20:35:18 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] add the functions for cnd_t

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Jens Gustedt wrote:
> diff --git a/src/thread/cnd_destroy.c b/src/thread/cnd_destroy.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7c24d1a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/thread/cnd_destroy.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +#include <threads.h>
> +
> +void (cnd_destroy)(cnd_t *cnd) {
> +	/* For private cv this is a no-op */
> +}

Is there a reason for the parens around the name? I'm assuming it was
related to a macro definition at some point, but we don't have one now
and it seems unlikely that it would be desirable to define away the
destroy call to a NOP, in case we ever want to switch to an
implementation where NOP is not suitable.

> diff --git a/src/thread/cnd_init.c b/src/thread/cnd_init.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c8aaee5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/thread/cnd_init.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +#include <threads.h>
> +
> +int cnd_init(cnd_t * c)
> +{
> +	*c = (cnd_t) {
> +		0
> +	};
> +	return thrd_success;
> +}

Just style, but generally we use {0} or { 0 } all on one line as a
zero-initializer. I would refrain from using multi-line unless (1)
we're using designated initializers, not just a universal zero
initializer, and (2) multi-line is actually needed for clarity or to
avoid exceeding 80 columns.

> diff --git a/src/thread/cnd_signal.c b/src/thread/cnd_signal.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..143883c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/thread/cnd_signal.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +#include <threads.h>
> +
> +int __private_cond_signal(cnd_t *, int);
> +
> +int cnd_signal(cnd_t * cnd) {
> +	/* This internal function never fails. */
> +	(void)__private_cond_signal(cnd, 1);

Cast-to-void isn't used in musl source except when it's necessary for
types (e.g. in ?:).

> +	return thrd_success;
> +}

This would be a candidate for "return thrd_success?thrd_success:ret",
I think.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.