[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfGGh0KVqrYDgQkd87AHBA0+x7Hx0rWrRmiFKh-P-xranguDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:23:27 +0200
From: "piranna@...il.com" <piranna@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Bug on fstat()?
> What prefix is musl-gcc installed in?
I'm using the musl packages availables on Ubuntu Unicorn, musl-gcc is
available at /usr/bin/musl-gcc and musl includes are at
/usr/include/i386-linux-musl
> And have you done anything to modify it or added additional include paths for it? The above symlinks don't make sense for a typical out-of-the-box installation.
I've not modified musl source code, only modifications have been to
add that symlinks for linux, asm & asm-generic includes so they are
available to Node.js during compilation. I didn't found a cleaner way
to do it. They are not required by Node.js itself, but instead by
libuv.
> I suspect you've somehow gotten -I/usr/include added to the CFLAGS during build
> (either doing it yourself, or as a result of a broken build script) if
> adding symlinks to /usr/include made a difference, in which case you
> may be using glibc's headers, not musl's, and thus getting broken
> results.
The build scripts are generated by GYP and the Node.js build process,
that I'm generating with
CC=musl-gcc ./configure --fully-static --without-ssl
(--fully-static is a flag that I've patched that adds '-static' to gcc call)
/usr/include should not be referenced, if so, I wouldn't need to add
the symlinks for /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm-generic :-/
Anyway, I'll review the full build process.
--
"Si quieres viajar alrededor del mundo y ser invitado a hablar en un
monton de sitios diferentes, simplemente escribe un sistema operativo
Unix."
– Linus Tordvals, creador del sistema operativo Linux
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
