[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1O-RzifARrJkvYM5UZyw353SOkJ_KbtEN_2R3BhoGPL1-d7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 19:28:53 -0400
From: Alec Salazar <alec.j.salazar@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: XPG4
I seem to be taking a wrong turn somewhere. Running find . -type f -print0
| xargs -0 /bin/grep D_FMT in /usr/include for the installed 1.1.4 yields:
./langinfo.h:#define D_FMT 0x20029
./langinfo.h:#define ERA_D_FMT 0x2002E
Pulling the latest sources and running the same command in gitdir yields:
./src/time/strptime.c: s = strptime(s, nl_langinfo(D_FMT),
tm);
./src/time/strftime.c: item = D_FMT;
./include/langinfo.h:#define D_FMT 0x20029
./include/langinfo.h:#define ERA_D_FMT 0x2002E
Neither directory yields a result for DATE_FMT. Am I botching the unix-fu,
barking up the wrong tree or something else entirely?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:31:23PM -0400, Alec Salazar wrote:
> > Is there any interest or plan to support the xopen xpg4 standard? My
> > specific interest is regarding zfs on linux. There is a function call
> > nl_langinfo(_DATE_FMT). Apparently this nl item was added in xpg4. I'm
> > wondering what the possibility is of a long-term solution.
>
> _DATE_FMT is just an incorrect or obsolete spelling for DATE_FMT. The
> latter is standard and is supported by musl.
>
> Rich
>
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
