[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140712131522.GG15705@port70.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 15:15:22 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fixing atomic asm constraints
* Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2014-07-11 18:53:26 -0400]:
> If we do opt for volatile asm everywhere, should we also use the
> "+m"(ptr) operand form just for the sake of being explicit that the
> asm accesses the atomic object?
i'd use "+m"(*ptr) to be explicit and i agree that volatile
is not needed but should not hurt either
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
