|
Message-ID: <20140626035924.GA2714@newbook> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:59:24 -0700 From: Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag@...il.com> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: ELF loader rejects older glibc binary Short version: I tried using a "libc6" shared binary that apparently is compatible with glibc back to 2.1, and musl rejected it as not a valid dynamic program. I've used this same binary on Debian 6, so it works elsewhere; but musl's loader is rejecting it. Long version: I'm trying to use a Brother DCP7065DN network printer with Alpine Linux; the drivers are closed-source though modified binaries are redistributable. The format used is a binary format having some relationship to PCL; I can't reverse-engineer it, so I'm stuck using the binary drivers for now. The drivers in question may be found here: http://support.brother.com/g/b/downloadlist.aspx?c=us&lang=en&prod=dcp7065dn_all&os=128 I grabbed the "LPR printer driver". After extracting it (ar x dcp7065*deb; tar xvzf data.tar.gz), I found the binaries in usr/local/Brother/Printer/DCP7065DN/{inf,lpd}/; the one I'd suggest poking at first is "usr/local/Brother/Printer/DCP7065DN/lpd/rawtobr3" (I previously determined that rawtobr3 does all the conversions). After locating the binaries and verifying with file that they were dynamically linked ELF binaries, I ran ldd. When this failed with the message: ldd: rawtobr3: Not a valid dynamic program I then ran "strace ldd rawtobr3"; the output indicates that musl mmap'd it and failed without trying to run it: ---start strace output--- execve("/usr/bin/ldd", ["ldd", "rawtobr3"], [/* 19 vars */]) = 0 open("rawtobr3", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\3\0\1\0\0\0\324\207\4\0104\0\0\0"..., 936) = 936 mmap2(0x8048000, 49152, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x566f1000 munmap(0x566f1000, 49152) = 0 writev(2, [{"ldd: rawtobr3: Not a valid dynam"..., 43}, {NULL, 0}], 2ldd: rawtobr3: Not a valid dynamic program ) = 43 exit_group(1) = ? +++ exited with 1 +++ ---end strace output--- strings suggests that it expects glibc 2.1 ABI, and that almost all the symbol requirements are met (_IO_stdin_used being the possible exception). Thanks, Isaac Dunham
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.