[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140614160243.GG179@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:02:43 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Binaries compiled with musl (1.1.2) are vulnerable to an
ancient ldd exploit
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Steven Honeyman wrote:
> I noticed this by accident (ran ldd as usual without even thinking)...
> but if you compile with musl-gcc, and use shared instead of static,
> then ldd can cause different behaviour in the binary (code will
> execute). It is described here [1] from 2009, on how to modify uclibc
> to enable this behaviour... musl needs no mods to achieve this!
>
> Simple example:
>
> $ echo 'void main() { puts("executed"); }' >lddtest.c
> $ musl-gcc lddtest.c && ldd ./a.out
>
> Of course the exploit is only useable if you check for
> LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS and do something different in the code if it
> is set.
I fail to see how this is exploiting anything. Running a musl-based
program with the glibc ldd utility does the exact same thing as
running the musl-based program directly. This does not give you any
additional privileges.
> [1] http://www.catonmat.net/blog/ldd-arbitrary-code-execution/
This is a social engineering exploit against the administrator. The
whole reason it happened is because somebody (not sure who was
originally responsible for this mistake) designed their ldd to
actually run the program, which is a horrible design. musl's ldd does
not do this, and musl does not support LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS. Yes
this makes it easier to make binaries that can be used for social
engineering, but it does not expose users of musl to any additional
danger, and in my view it actually increases awareness about the
danger of glibc ldd since users who run it on musl binaries see
immediately what it's doing behind the curtains. (Actually, I think
this issue may be fixed in modern glibc ldd, but I'm not sure.)
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
