[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53983242.3090403@f-prot.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 10:41:06 +0000
From: Oliver Schneider <musl-mailinglist@...rot.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl 1.0.x branch
Hi Rich,
in my case I'll try to stick to the latest version labeled "stable".
The website currently still doesn't call 1.1.2 stable, so I simply
haven't upgraded to it yet.
* Latest release is 1.1.2.
* Current stable maintenance release is 1.0.3.
I think many others will share thus view, because it's best to rely on
the developer for that information, i.e. whether some code is deemed
stable or not.
Best regards,
// Oliver
On 2014-06-06 17:56, Rich Felker wrote:
> I'm about to prepare the 1.0.3 release, and I've been thinking a bit
> about the future of the 1.0.x branch. Specifically I'd like to gauge
> the extent to which it's being used. So far cherry-picking fixes to it
> has been pretty easy, but it's an extra task to keep up with, and the
> cherry-picking is probably going to turn into active backporting
> somewhere in the near future as the rs-1.0 and master branches
> continue to diverge.
>
> If I don't hear back that there's significant use of the 1.0.x
> releases by multiple projects, I'll probably plan to discontinue them
> in the next 4 to 6 months, and in the mean time, to release only when
> there are serious bugs (as opposed to releasing alongside every 1.1.x
> release). Does this sound reasonable?
>
> If anyone's using 1.0.x not for the sake of stability but because it
> works better in some way for your setup (e.g. size, performance,
> application compatibility, etc.) please let me know about that too so
> we can see if there's a reasonable way to make 1.1.x work just as well
> for you.
>
> Rich
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
