[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5384B12F.5010909@midipix.org>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 18:37:19 +0300
From: "writeonce@...ipix.org" <writeonce@...ipix.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: checks involving LDBL_MANT_DIG
On 05/27/2014 06:00 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * writeonce@...ipix.org <writeonce@...ipix.org> [2014-05-27 07:23:20 -0700]:
>> In src/complex/*, several files check for LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53 &&
>> LDBL_MAX_EXP == 1024, however according to src/stdio/vfprintf.c,
>> (LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53) is considered incorrect and would cause a
>> compile-time error. Does this mean that the above checks in
>> src/complex/* may be eliminated?
> there is nothing wrong with LDBL_MANT_DIG == 53
>
> vfprintf only checks if long double really has appropriate size in that case
>
>
Thanks, that explains everything... wrong experiment on my part.
zg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
