[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALS3df2uYSN+G1FDVm5dPtGq2GwTtAQ_WCVyeM5fYk7xR6HmdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 21:11:24 +0200
From: Paweł Dziepak <pdziepak@...rnos.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add definition of max_align_t to stddef.h
2014-05-08 20:45 GMT+02:00 Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>:
> Hello,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2014, 13:41 -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
>> BTW in your above example, it's not even clear to me if that use of
>> alignas is valid.
>
> Besides the question of such a thing makes sense or noţ with the
> current version of the standard it isn't syntactically valid. alignas
> can't be applied to struct fields. So for the moment the whole
> discussion in the standard about types with extended alignment is
> pointless.
>
> This issue has been raised as a defect report, and it seems that the
> committee agrees to change this in a corrigendum.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_444.htm
My bad, it is legal in C++11 though.
Paweł
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
