|
Message-ID: <20140508164236.GS12324@port70.net> Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 18:42:36 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: strptime problems * Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2014-05-08 00:32:14 -0400]: > to get it done now. However I'm not clear on what the behavior of > strptime should be when reading "derived" fields that don't actually > correspond to anything in the "struct tm". Should it just parse and > ignore them, or should it somehow convert back? The week-based-year > stuff is probably the biggest question but there are others too. strptime seems to be underspecified, it's not clear what happens in case of inconsistent input, what tm_* fields should be filled out, etc glibc sets tm.tm_wday when it can be calculated, musl doesn't glibc sets __tm_gmtoff so strptime depends on the current tz setting glibc supports %s in strptime (non-posix), musl doesn't in musl invalid format strings don't fail now in the numeric_range logic i think a <= can be changed into < --- a/src/time/strptime.c +++ b/src/time/strptime.c @@ -138,10 +138,12 @@ char *strptime(const char *restrict s, const char *restrict f, struct tm *restri case '%': if (*s++ != '%') return 0; break; + default: + return 0; numeric_range: if (!isdigit(*s)) return 0; *dest = 0; - for (i=1; i<=min+range && isdigit(*s); i*=10) + for (i=1; i<min+range && isdigit(*s); i*=10) *dest = *dest * 10 + *s++ - '0'; if (*dest - min >= (unsigned)range) return 0; *dest -= adj;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.