|
|
Message-ID: <20140508164236.GS12324@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 18:42:36 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: strptime problems
* Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org> [2014-05-08 00:32:14 -0400]:
> to get it done now. However I'm not clear on what the behavior of
> strptime should be when reading "derived" fields that don't actually
> correspond to anything in the "struct tm". Should it just parse and
> ignore them, or should it somehow convert back? The week-based-year
> stuff is probably the biggest question but there are others too.
strptime seems to be underspecified, it's not clear what happens
in case of inconsistent input, what tm_* fields should be filled
out, etc
glibc sets tm.tm_wday when it can be calculated, musl doesn't
glibc sets __tm_gmtoff so strptime depends on the current tz setting
glibc supports %s in strptime (non-posix), musl doesn't
in musl invalid format strings don't fail now
in the numeric_range logic i think a <= can be changed into <
--- a/src/time/strptime.c
+++ b/src/time/strptime.c
@@ -138,10 +138,12 @@ char *strptime(const char *restrict s, const char *restrict f, struct tm *restri
case '%':
if (*s++ != '%') return 0;
break;
+ default:
+ return 0;
numeric_range:
if (!isdigit(*s)) return 0;
*dest = 0;
- for (i=1; i<=min+range && isdigit(*s); i*=10)
+ for (i=1; i<min+range && isdigit(*s); i*=10)
*dest = *dest * 10 + *s++ - '0';
if (*dest - min >= (unsigned)range) return 0;
*dest -= adj;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.