[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140504000453.GA16268@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 20:04:53 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: adding errc to support sed (FreeBSD)
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 07:58:48PM -0400, writeonce@...ipix.org wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> The FreeBSD implementation of sed uses errc; its implementation
> should probably be as simple as:
>
> _Noreturn void errc(int eval, int status, const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> va_list ap;
> va_start(ap, fmt);
> vwarnx(status, fmt, ap);
> va_end(ap);
> exit(eval);
> }
What's the difference between this and other forms in err.h? Is there
a 'v' version of it too?
> The FreeBSD sed also needs a couple of macros that are currently not
> defined, specifically ALLPERMS, DEFFILEMODE and REG_STARTEND. Any
> reason not to add them when _BSD_SOURCE is defined?
Where would these be defined? If they're in a junk header I'm not so
opposed to them, but musl aims to have a cleaner namespace than legacy
systems, whereas at least ALLPERMS and DEFFILEMODE are ugly and don't
fit any sort of namespace pattern.
As for REG_STARTEND, is it an alias for some regex flag that already
exists, or a feature that would need to be implemented?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
