[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140502161355.GV26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:13:55 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Co-existing i386 and x86_64 libraries?
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:47:10AM +0000, Oliver Schneider wrote:
> Hi Rich, all,
>
> On 2014-04-30 03:00, Rich Felker wrote:
> > You need separate libdirs for each arch. This is fundamental; it's not
> > specific to musl.
> But the include dirs can be shared, or are the headers being "primed"
> somehow, during the build?
I was talking about things needed for runtime. For development you
even need separate bin dirs (think pkg-conf, getconf, etc.) for the
configure scripts to work right. At present musl's headers can be
shared between archs except for the bits subdir (so you can make a
custom install where bits isn't in the shared include dir, and instead
add it to gcc's default include path) but this isn't a permanent
guarantee that it will work that way. You're best off having all
development-related files be separate per-arch.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
