[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140428142935.GZ26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:29:35 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bits/socket.h: Define SO_RCVBUFFORCE for mips
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:43:52PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> packages like udev are using it
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>
>
> Upstream-Status: Pending
> ---
> arch/mips/bits/socket.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/bits/socket.h b/arch/mips/bits/socket.h
> index ba79045..2264679 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/bits/socket.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/bits/socket.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct cmsghdr
> #define SO_RCVBUF 0x1002
> #define SO_KEEPALIVE 8
> #define SO_OOBINLINE 256
> +#define SO_RCVBUFFORCE 33
>
> #define SO_NO_CHECK 11
> #define SO_PRIORITY 12
> --
> 1.7.10.4
I think this is correct, but are there additional new SO_*'s that
should be added to mips, or is this value the same as on other archs
and perhaps not something that should be arch-specific to begin with?
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
