|
Message-ID: <20140421082155.GC12324@port70.net> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:21:55 +0200 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: static musl-based gdb and -fPIC * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2014-04-21 09:33:47 +0200]: > yes they define posix_ prefixed symbols for internal use > which are reserved names for the c implementation when > any standard headers are included > > the next posix standard defines posix_close so this is a > real collision (and will be an issue with every conformant > libc), but all the other posix_ symbols are wrong there too it seems it was already reported and "fixed" http://bugs.python.org/issue20594 the fix is broken though
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.