[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140410141012.GV3914@waldemar-brodkorb.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:10:14 +0200
From: Waldemar Brodkorb <mail@...demar-brodkorb.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: automatic musl-test
Hi,
Szabolcs Nagy wrote,
> * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2014-04-09 22:36:53 +0200]:
>
> > * Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> [2014-04-09 22:16:24 +0200]:
> > > * Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@...nadk.org> [2014-04-09 17:07:59 +0200]:
> > > > A report generated from today, is here:
> > > > http://openadk.org/musl-test/
> > > >
> > >
> > > hm something is wrong with the i686-git float tests
> > >
> >
> > can you send me some test binaries built by your toolchain?
> >
>
> ok i downloaded the adk-test-framework and the i686
> root fs has glibc in it..
Sure, the base system is glibc.
> that explains all the errors :)
>
> may be you should report the bugs to glibc..
>
> (i knew about several fp errors in glibc but i never had
> a recent enough glibc to test them)
Hmm, but the libc-test is compiled with musl libc via a special
specs file. So no glibc code involved while executing the test
binaries.
$ readelf -a libc-test/src/math/fenv.exe|grep interpreter
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-musl-i686.so.1]
Upps, and here we see, that the wrong interpreter is linked into the
binary. I fixed it. Get a new REPORT.
best regards
Waldemar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
