[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140409121455.GH21662@example.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:14:55 +0200
From: u-igbb@...ey.se
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: memmem() - is it correct?
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:19:03PM +0300, Timo Teras wrote:
> > const char *haystack = "abcde";
> > return(!memmem(haystack, 4, "cde", 3));
> > returns 1 (as I would expect it to) if linked against uclibc
> > returns 0 if linked against musl
> > (on ia32)
> musl looks correct to me. "abcde" is five bytes. You test for 4 bytes
I am testing for 3 bytes "cde" inside 4 bytes "abcd", this should not
be successful.
> so it's infact searching from haystack equivalent of "abcd".
Exactly. It does _not_ contain "cde". This should return NULL
from the memmem() and hence 1 from main().
> I'd say uclibc is off-by-one, and broken.
I guess you misinterpreted the test code, there is a '!' which transforms
a returned pointer (success) to 0 exit status in main() and vice versa.
Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
