[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140329195422.GM8221@example.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:54:22 +0000
From: u-igbb@...ey.se
To: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: malloc not behaving well when brk space is limited?
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 02:56:19PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> Yes, I understand. I didn't mean that this can't or shouldn't be
> fixed, just that the changes I had hoped to make to malloc in the
> 1.1.x series are not looking like the right direction for fixing this,
> so we're back to the question of what to do.
>
> If you need a fix (or at least a workaround) right away, let me know
> and I'll see if I can think of anything.
Thanks Rich,
I would appreciate your support for any tenable solution.
The very ugly workaround which I am testing now is to temporarily
resort to the implicit loader. This seems to work, with a hack of the
kind I posted at first, introducing a "ONCE_LD_LIBRARY_PATH" variable
and renaming it afterwards (introducing the possible slight environment
corruption).
This is far from a solution, just slightly better than a complete halt.
Nevertheless I feel moving to musl if worth the effort.
So if you can think of any half-usable solution to make malloc compatible
with the standalone loader, I would happily go for it.
Regards,
Rune
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
