|
Message-ID: <20140328152538.GI27448@port70.net> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 16:25:39 +0100 From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: be able to break inheritance of LD_LIBRARY_PATH * u-igbb@...ey.se <u-igbb@...ey.se> [2014-03-28 14:00:36 +0000]: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > > why do you use LD_LIBRARY_PATH then? > > I "do not". I am using the --library-path argument to the dynamic loader. > (Unless LD_LIBRARY_PATH is forced upon myself by someone else; > then I need protection from its potentially detrimental side effects) [..] > > if you mean you can run '/lib/ld-linux.so.2 binary' then musl can do the same > > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. > > I was thinking of a "cheap and dirty workaround" while the most > appropriate is of course to add the missing argument parsing. > i still don't get what you are trying to achieve what is the difference between /lib/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path libpath binary and LD_LIBRARY_PATH=libpath /lib/ld-linux.so.2 binary ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.