[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <532D913C.7080407@opensource.dyc.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:33:48 -0400
From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@...nsource.dyc.edu>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: i686 with -fPIE and -fstack-protector-all
On 03/22/2014 09:06 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Anthony G. Basile <basile@...nsource.dyc.edu> [2014-03-22 08:53:07 -0400]:
>> I've hit a bug with 1.0.0 on i686. When building with
>> -fstack-protector-all and -fPIE, I get an undefined reference to
>> `__stack_chk_fail_local'. I do not get this on x86_64:
>>
>
> may be this gcc bug should be in the faq
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-01/msg00012.html
> http://git.alpinelinux.org/cgit/aports/tree/main/musl/__stack_chk_fail_local.c
>
Thanks it. I was going to adopt a patch like alpines but hesitated in
csae I was missing something.
Aside: it looks like alpine is hitting a lot of the same issues i am
with gentoo+musl and adopting similar approaches, like getent and ldconfig.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
