[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYEQSv1kLbJRkAQFGLQFZcvY94LHcu39DfFUsoAYondAvwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 17:47:05 +0100
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: Removing sbrk and brk
2014-02-21 17:36 GMT+01:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>:
> * Daniel Cegie?ka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com> [2014-02-21 17:03:36 +0100]:
>> And what do we do with failures when sbrk is used?
>>
>
> most of these only call sbrk(0) which is supported
ok, thank you for the information.
>> http://ex-vi.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ex-vi/ex-vi/ex_subr.c?revision=1.8&view=markup
>>
>
> the "old musl" did not support sbrk either (the cited code uses it
> with malloc), the "new musl" just helps you find the bug more easily
ex/vi doesn't work with the new musl. Too bad, because it is the
traditional unix ex/vi. Maybe Gunnar Ritter still fixes bugs.
best regards,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
