[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140213214223.GF23551@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:42:23 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: LMDB test failures under musl on mips
* Martin Lucina <martin@...ina.net> [2014-02-13 21:50:40 +0100]:
> I'm currently using musl libc and LMDB [1] in a new project. When
> developing on a Debian x86_64 host everything works fine, but when building
> for a target device (OpenWRT mips or mipsel, I've tried both) with static
> linking my LMDB code starts failing with assertions and/or segfaults inside
> LMDB itself.
>
> Cross-compiling to statically linked musl on x86_64 does not have the
> problem.
>
> It's possible that the problem is LMDB itself; I can ask on the OpenLDAP
> lists but I'd like to check here first if someone else has encountered this
> problem?
>
mips was not nearly as extensively tested as x86 targets and
it has a lot of arch specific syscall quirks
so it may be a musl bug, if you have strace on the target
then please send a strace log
what is the pagesize used on the target?
(iirc some mips can be non 4k)
> You can reproduce the problem fairly easily by building the mtest* programs
> that come with LMDB. Running mtest a few times (after creating ./testdb)
> reliably gives either a segfault or various assertion failures in LMDB.
>
> Note that I'm using the prebuilt toolchains from musl.codu.org (thanks!),
> and the 0.9,15 release.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Martin
>
> [1] http://symas.com/mdb/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
