Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131204060135.GZ24286@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:01:35 -0500
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Release test framework

On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:51:42PM +0800, 邓尧 wrote:
> If busybox is used, the test framework itself would depend  on musl-libc,
> which means test test framework would depend on the test subject. In
> theory, it's a bad bad idea.
> 
> 0.02$

The busybox used need not even be linked with musl; it could be a
uclibc-linked binary from aboriginal, for example. The point was not
to use busybox as any major part of the test framework, just to have a
shell to run the script that would run all the tests from the
libc-test package inside qemu.

Rich

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.