[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <93D5A629-281D-4211-ACC2-A46607EFE2F0@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:18:34 -0800
From: James Gregurich <bayoubengal@....com>
To: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Cc: "musl@...ts.openwall.com" <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: question float.h & powerpc
Actually, i looked in the version of the code they supplied...not in the official source. I don't know if it is part of he official code base.
Sent from my iPad
> On Nov 16, 2013, at 4:37 AM, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net> wrote:
>
> * James Gregurich <bayoubengal@....com> [2013-11-16 00:56:49 -0800]:
>>> i think it's wrong of llvm and clang to try to know about
>>> all the users and toolchains of their code and hard-wire
>>> special cases for them (i've seen hacks like that for
>>> emscripten in clang too)
>>
>>
>> I dug deep for one and finally started going through the source code to find an answer. That is all I found.
>>
>> He probably should have made the triplet based on musl rather than ell cl..it he changes his c library to one that can handle the double doubles, then he has to change llvm again.
>
> no, this is llvm's fault (if this is in the upstream repo)
>
> it should be a build time config option so the functionality
> can be requested without editing the version controlled source
>
> you should report the bug to them
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
