musl - sscanf(3) return value doesn't count %100c assignments

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <loom.20131115T212022-997@post.gmane.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
From: David Wuertele <dave+gmane@...rtele.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: sscanf(3) return value doesn't count %100c assignments

Comparing musl-0.9.14 with glibc-2.13, I find sscanf(3) behaves
differently.  In Glibc, sscanf() returns the same assignment counts when
using %Nc compared with using %s, but in Mulsl, sscanf returns different
assignment counts.

For example, take the following two instructions:

  sscanf (string, "%d %s", &number, remainder);
  sscanf (string, "%d %100c", &number, remainder);

If each of these makes two assignments, they should both return 2.
Glibc works this way.  But even though with Musl they both make two
assignments, Musl sscanf() returns 2 for the %s and it returns 1 for
the %100c version.

Here is a test program:

  #include <stdio.h>
  #include <strings.h>

  int main ()
  {
    int number = 0;
    char *string = "1234 five six seven";
    char remainder[100];
    bzero (remainder, sizeof(remainder));
    int args = sscanf (string, "%d %s", &number, remainder);
    fprintf (stderr,
             "format=%%s string=\"%s\" args=%d number=%d remainder=%s\n",
             string, args, number, remainder);
    args = sscanf (string, "%d %100c", &number, remainder);
    fprintf (stderr,
             "format=%%100c string=\"%s\" args=%d number=%d remainder=%s\n",
             string, args, number, remainder);

    return 0;
  }

Here is how I compile them:

  arm-tegra452-linux-gnueabi-gcc --static test.c -o test-glibc
  arm-linux-musleabishf-gcc -static test.c -o test-musl

Here is what I see when I execute them:

  # ./test-musl
  format=%s string="1234 five six" args=2 number=1234 remainder=five
  format=%100c string="1234 five six" args=1 number=1234 remainder=five six
  # ./test-glibc
  format=%s string="1234 five six" args=2 number=1234 remainder=five
  format=%100c string="1234 five six" args=2 number=1234 remainder=five six

This seems like a bug to me.  I tried to read through
musl-0.9.14/src/stdio/vfscanf.c to troubleshoot this, but I couldn't find the
source of the difference.  Can anyone give me pointers to build a musl-libc
that has a sscanf() that is compatible with glibc's sscanf()?

Thanks,
Dave

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.