[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131107020120.GY1685@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 03:01:20 +0100
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.13?]
* Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu> [2013-11-06 19:34:47 -0500]:
> Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2013Q2 on
> musl 0.9.13, with patches from
> http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision
> b44694ce2dd6.
>
> Attempted: 11270
> Deps failed: 3248
> Build tried: 8022
> Build failed: 912
> Tests failed: 1824
> Success: 5286 (65.8938%)
it would be nice if you saved all the build logs
of failed builds and published them as well
i dont expect interesting findings: i assume most
failures are bad includes, bad ifdefs or bad config
but i'd like to see this theory verified
> Breakdown:
> https://sites.google.com/a/codu.org/musl/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-b44694ce2dd6-musl-0.9.13-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1
> or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results
http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/pkgsrc_results
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
