[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <526F21F5.2010806@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:48:21 +0100
From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Feature request
On 29/10/13 03:33, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:13:09PM +0000, Paul Schutte wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Would it be possible for you to add the version of musl to the output of
>> libc.so ?
>>
>> root@...otage:~# /lib/libc.so
>> musl libc/dynamic program loader
>> usage: /lib/libc.so pathname [args]
>>
>> I have several machines with musl on it and it will be very helpful to see
>> which version is installed.
>
> Indeed, this has been something I've wanted to add for a while, and
> which should definitely be in for 1.0. It's just a matter of doing the
> right thing in the build and release system to get the version in
> there, and it's not clear what the version should read for git builds
> between versions. I think this is a good chance to discuss that.
git describe short signature might be the best option.
lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
