|
Message-ID: <52419D3B.1030209@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:10:03 +0200 From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@...too.org> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: musl 0.9.14 released On 24/09/13 15:51, John Spencer wrote: >> Sometime soon I also want to focus on what the development and release >> model post-1.0 will be, especially whether we'll aim to maintain a >> 'stable' branch with minimal new features alongside new development. > > having a stable branch which only gets backports of bugfixes makes sense > if we aim for inclusion in conservative distributions. > if nothing else, it signals that we care about stability. > otoh it's much more work to maintain... If you want a stable branch I found _really_ useful having tags such as CC: musl-stable@...l-libc.org But you need at least 2 people doing the actual backporting weekly. lu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.