[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52387575.4000207@purdue.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:29:57 -0400
From: Gregor Richards <gr@...due.edu>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Latest pkgsrc results [What builds on musl 0.9.12?]
Here are the results from my latest build of NetBSD pkgsrc 2013Q2 on
musl 0.9.12, with patches from
http://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches revision 999f342e0633.
Attempted: 11274
Deps failed: 3336
Build tried: 7938
Build failed: 919
Tests failed: 1811
Success: 5208 (65.6085%)
Breakdown:
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-999f342e0633-musl-0.9.12-breakdown.txt?attredirects=0&d=1
or http://wiki.musl-libc.org/pkgsrc_results (once the wiki is working
and I can update it)
Archive:
http://musl.codu.org/pkgsrc-results/pkgsrc-results-2013Q2-999f342e0633-musl-0.9.12.tar.gz?attredirects=0&d=1
Notes:
In the breakdown, 'D' means dependencies, 'B' means build, 'T' means
tests. Blank is success, 'X' is failure.
Yes, I know musl 0.9.13 is already out. It took me a while to run these, OK!
Perl had strange problems this time 'round. Didn't seem to be related to
musl though. This particularly influenced tests for all Perl packages,
bringing down the overall success rate artificially.
If you have patches to make other packages build, please report them on
the musl-pkgsrc-patches issue tracker:
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches/issues .
As with all of my repositories, musl-pkgsrc-patches is also available
via git: http://github.com/GregorR/musl-pkgsrc-patches .
If you reply to this email, please reply-all. I am not presently
subscribed to this mailing list, as it has no digest option.
With valediction,
- Gregor Richards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
