[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D09784B3-CA98-4F18-A5F2-5463C6A64B90@lightcubesolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:28:36 -0400
From: Jeremy Huntwork <jhuntwork@...htcubesolutions.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Optimized C memset [v2]
On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> wrote:
> Here's version 2 (filename version 6, in honor of glibc ;) of the
> memset code. I fixed a bug in the logic for coverage of the tail (the
> part past what's covered by the loop) for some values of n and
> alignments, and cleaned up the __GNUC__ usage a bit to use less
> #ifdeffery. The remaining test at the top for the __GNUC__ version is
> ugly, I admit, and should possibly just be removed and replaced by a
> configure check to add -D__may_alias__= to the CFLAGS if the compiler
> defines __GNUC__ but does not recognize __attribute__((__may_alias__))
> -- opinions on this?
Doing the test via configure and setting a flag seems more consistent with comments that have been made elsewhere on this list about the correct way to feature test.
JH
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
