[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1376533061.2737.26@driftwood>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:17:41 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>, Jens <jensl@...s.mine.nu>
Subject: Re: problems with dynamic linking since 0.9.1
On 08/13/2013 09:53:00 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Jens <jensl@...s.mine.nu> [2013-08-13 13:18:27 +0200]:
> > On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > >
> > >you didn't tell us the problem
> > >
> > >at least show a crashing dynamic linked executable
> > >with straced loader and musl ldd output
> >
> > Sorry. Its actually linking the binary that doesnt work.
> >
>
> ah ok i did not see that
>
> i'd check libc.so if there is some obvious error
> ld should be able to handle it
> (eg file libc.so, readelf -a libc.so, nm -D libc.so, or just
> ./libc.so)
>
> since you use landley's weird toolchain it may be a
> problem with the old binutils
I do test build musl with that toolchain from time to time, and I've
modified the binutils in it to support what musl needs before. I'm
doing a fresh test build under the most recent Aboriginal x86-64 system
image in another window, but this netbook is slow and qemu is slower...
> > bash-4.1# musl-gcc -c t.c
> > bash-4.1# musl-gcc t.o
I note that "bash-4.1" is not the version in my system images but it
_is_ in the Linux From Scratch images. He didn't say what architecture
he was building for, but I haven't made it to the end of the thread
yet...
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
