|
Message-ID: <51FD67EF.6080205@barfooze.de> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 22:28:31 +0200 From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com CC: Kirk Terrell <knjterrell@...luelight.com> Subject: Re: Embedded distro On 08/03/2013 06:19 PM, Kirk Terrell wrote: > Good morning, > > I've been working on a distro that is a fork from the CLFS Embedded > project that uses musl libc in place of libc. I've managed to boot an > emulated Vexpress-a9 target using the instructions at > http://kanj.github.io/elfs/book/armMusl/index.html. looking at http://kanj.github.io/elfs/book/armMusl/materials/packages.html it mentions uclibc, but not musl. is there a specific reason you use ancient busybox and kernel ? using busybox 1.20.2 with the patches used by sabotage[1] would at least give you a completely working sed that can be used to build anything that depends on sed without having to install gnu's. [1] https://github.com/rofl0r/sabotage/tree/master/KEEP
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.