Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130730142609.GA2033@Caracal>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:26:09 -0700
From: idunham@...abit.com
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: musl 0.9.12 released

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:14:34PM +0200, Gregor Pintar wrote:
> 2013/7/29, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>:
> > * Gregor Pintar <grpintar@...il.com> [2013-07-29 19:37:19 +0200]:
> >>
> >> I have a problem. When I try to compile it, I get this:
> >>
> >
> > are you sure the x86_64 arch is correct?
> >
> > seems gcc does not know about x86_64 registers in the asm
> >
> > i'd check the target in gcc -v
> 
> Yes, x86_64 is correct arch. Target is also correct.
> "as crt1.s" also works. It's probably something wrong with gcc.

Maybe see what happens if you pass a flag that forces binutils to use
64-bit mode (--64 is documented in the as man page)?

It looked to me like gcc generated 64-bit code, then invoked as
in 32-bit mode.

HTH,
Isaac Dunham

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.