[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724144726.GU3249@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:47:27 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Missing symbols for supporting glibc-built libstdc++.so.6
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:20:03PM +0800, orc wrote:
> About a year ago while experimenting with musl desktop, various
> binary blobs I unfortunately tied to (you should remember
> short discuss about nvidia blob compatibility) I tried to use my host
> libstdc++.so with musl linker and that failed because of gnu "unique
> symbol" extension. Did you encountered same problem here? If so, is
> it solved now?
I have only tested with simple C++ .so files using the musl-built
libstdc++.so, and so far, they've worked fine. These tests are by no
means extensive, just "hello world". I have not tried using the
glibc-built libstdc++.so.6 again; the "missing symbols" check was
based purely on the output of:
nm -u -D libstdc++.so.6 | grep -v -e _[UJ] -e ' w '
Do you know the subject line of the thread where your issue was
discussed before? I'd be happy to go look and see if I think the issue
is fixed now.
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
