Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374062978.20259.243.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:09:38 +0200
From: Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@...ia.fr>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: time code progress

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2013, 13:39 +0200 schrieb Szabolcs Nagy:
> (i think it did not like the syscall arg counting in case of 0 args in
> #define __SYSCALL_NARGS_X(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,n,...) n
> #define __SYSCALL_NARGS(...) __SYSCALL_NARGS_X(__VA_ARGS__,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0)
> )

yes, this is in fact not suitable to test for 0 args. For the
preprocessor 0 args basically doesn't exist, there is always one
argument, but which is empty.

If this is really needed, I could contribute a cooked down version
from P99 of an NARGS macro that could deal with such a case. Please
let me know.

Jens

-- 
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :: http://www.loria.fr/~gustedt/   ::
:: AlGorille ::::::::::::::: office Nancy : +33 383593090   ::
:: ICube :::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536   ::
:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183   ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.