[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3m8eAUT2EJ=GymSB97=1FbM5EDYZnDGU0ZSM8pKgfMxzcEBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:49:55 -0500
From: Strake <strake888@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: embedded newbies site.
On 16/07/2013, LM <lmemsm@...il.com> wrote:
> Sites like suckless.org state what they consider are better and worse software choices.
> Would be nice to see some actual statistics and rationale backing up what is considered better or worse design.
No statistics, but they surely have rationale: http://suckless.org/sucks
> Musl's useful not just for embedded systems but for older machines that
> want to run efficient desktop environments. However, what works for a
> desktop environment might not work well for an embedded system and so on.
True, but small code wins everywhere, for it fits more easily in cache.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
