Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL3m8eCHV_oEwPwou714tS7E7W3GTdhOm-Z1pCJEAjWE07HR_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:13:18 -0500
From: Strake <strake888@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: regex libs (was Re: embedded newbies site.)

On 16/07/2013, LM <lmemsm@...il.com> wrote:
> Would have been
> nice if they offered actual regular expressions handling if you only want
> to use the POSIX compatible part of the interface.

Why? If one only needs the POSIX compatible interface, just use POSIX libc.

> So what are some good regex library solutions?  I'm also wondering if there
> are some good cross-platform portable library solutions (or if PCRE is the
> best pattern matching solution from a portability standpoint even if it's
> not strictly regex compatible).

This is no matter of compatibility; it's in general simply NOT a
regex. Actually, neither is POSIX Basic.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.