[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130712155339.GB29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:53:39 -0400
From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: OIN Notice - Definition Update
[license@...ninventionnetwork.com]
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:34:57AM -0400, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:32:27AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > If you were looking for a list of packages to test musl against before
> > 1.0, the Open Invention Network seems to have come up with a list of
> > 593 packages they define as "The Linux System".
>
> This list looks like something a crazy person put together. It's
> basically everything available in OpenSUSE plus the android SDK. There
> is garbage in here like mono and mod_ruby.
Indeed, this sounds like nothing but "Pointy Hair Linux" conformance,
which I think we can do without. Trying to meet these requirements is
akin to ISO C adding Annex K and other junk to make Microsoft happy.
They knew there was no hope of Microsoft actually adopting the C
standard, so why even bother trying to make them happy? Similarly,
"Pointy Hair Linux" is not adopting musl anytime soon, so worrying
about conforming to their silly requirements seems like a waste of
time and energy...
Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
