|
Message-ID: <20130709165041.GT29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:50:41 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Cc: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> Subject: Re: Re: Linux manpages (was Re: Request for volunteers) On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > >See https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/todo.html#migrate_to_kernel_source > >I think it would be a retrograde step to split syscall pages into > >Sections 2 and 3. Users want to get the documentation in one place. > >Note that the approach in man-pages (consolidating info on the syscall > >plus any libc additions in one page) is not unique to Linux. From some > >(offlist) discussions with the BSD man pages maintainers, it appears > >that at least some (all?) of the BSDs do the same. > > Document what the syscall does, and then have wrapper behavior > listed in the "deviant glibc-specific perversions" section? Usually the difference between sections 2 and 3 is not "deviant glibc-specific perversions" but "workarounds for kernel bugs that won't be fixed because of the policy of maintaining stable syscall API/ABI". > Syscall wrappers in Section 2 make sense, it _is_ a syscall, and > most wrappers should be NOPs. None of the ones that are cancellation points can be pure wrappers. If nothing else, they must handle cancellation. That covers a big chunk already. > The objection is not documenting what > the actual syscall does (when you can call it via syscall(), or get > the raw behavior when using klibc). I agree it would be useful to have this information, but with limited resources and the issue of confusing developers who get section 2 by default then have to look again in section 3 for the man page they actually wanted, I can see where it's probably preferable to maintain the status quo, leaving the 2/3 split based on the historical expectation of whether the function was a "syscall" or "library function", and documenting Linux syscall deviations from the public interface as part of the combined man page. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.