|
Message-ID: <20130701033113.GV29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 23:31:13 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Request for volunteers On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 03:29:14PM -0700, idunham@...abit.com wrote: > > What might be better for the near future is to get the POSIX man pages > > project updated to match POSIX-2008+TC1 so that users of musl who want > > I seem to recall running across the request for this; IIRC, the > maintainer said he'd wait until TOG uploaded an nroff tarball for > POSIX2008. This sounds unlikely. My understanding was that the people who released the "3p" man pages generated them from the published POSIX spec (Issue 6) with the blessing of the Open Group to license them acceptably for distribution. I don't think the Open Group gave them nroff files though... > The linux man pages project may focus on glibc, but they document > differences in other Linux libc versions; it might make sense to try > sending them patches that document musl differences. > Besides avoiding a new project, this would be more convenient for those > targetting multiple systems (eventually, a developer on Debian or RHEL > would see it while reading the man page...). I agree this would be ideal, but I think it would require convincing them that musl is noteworthy for inclusion in the man pages (where, for example, uClibc, dietlibc, klibc, etc. do not seem to be considered noteworthy). I'm not sure if we would face political obstacles here, but we could certainly try. > Of course, this doesn't cover the man pages for BSD-specific functions. I think there are only a very few BSD functions in musl which are not also in glibc. Writing man pages for these, or copying and editing the BSD ones, would not be a huge task. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.