|
Message-ID: <20130607162326.GA30843@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:23:26 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: ether_* functions Hi all, The previous conversation about ether_aton/ntoa trailed off without really reaching a conclusion. I'd like to get these interfaces integrated for the next release. Does anyone have opinions on which version we should use: the think sscanf/snprintf wrappers (which I proposed), or the versions (by Strake) with all the logic inline that don't depend on other heavy functions? Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.