[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130530083711.GF7095@port70.net>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:37:11 +0200
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@...t70.net>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: util-linux-2.23 mount segmentation fault error
* plan9assembler <plan9assembler@...il.com> [2013-05-30 16:26:13 +0900]:
>
> it still gets same segfaults, same bt gdb result.
>
if you get the exact same segfault then you do something wrong
..or malloc(200) is not enough
> and it is clear to me that latest musl libc[2013/05/29] contain new bug,
> because,
> below abnormal operation never happened before. (musl version git pulled at
> 2013/05/03)
>
> # ./mount /dev/sda1 /mnt
> EXT4-fs (sda1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
>
> < 30 - 40 seconds waiting without return to shell>
>
> mount: /mnt: filesystem mounted, but mount(8) failedOperation timed out
> // <-- this is weird.
> #
works here fine
since you have local modifications i'd check those first
i doubt that latest musl has any related bug
but you could easily prove me wrong with a strace
that shows bad flags passed to some syscall
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
