[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130425135446.GA16788@intma.in>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:54:47 -0400
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@...ma.in>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements?
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 09:34:35AM +0200, Jens Staal wrote:
> On 2013-04-25 07:55, Kurt H Maier wrote:
>
> Does it work as a drop-in replacement for unixy utf/wchar
> implementations or is it the Plan9 variant (reference to Runes implies
> the later)? I found myself needing at first libwchar from heirloom and
> later the (old) GNU libutf8 under APE to provide some wchar-related
> functions expected by various applications.
>
> It felt really silly to "devolve" like that.
It's the Plan 9 variant -- wchar is a thing that needs to go away...
maybe one day we can get there. :(
khm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
